![]() Using JSON in your URLs will have a bunch of up-front annoyances to resolve, but the overall benefits might make it worth trying. Once it's past that check, you should only see the decoded string in any error messages or logging output.Ĭreating a clean abstraction takes extra work, especially if you've been used to getting away without it. Similarly, you shouldn't have to deal with the ugly version of the URL unless you have an invalid URL. ![]() In practice, these characters should be percent-encoded, as noted in the base specification. For example, you don't ever deal with raw network packets unless something goes wrong at the packet level. Note: The above example URI shows unencoded and characters simply for readability. Rest API -> passing json string as parameter. It also looks ugly, but that can be solved by taking abstraction seriously. How do I pass json as a query parameter on Rest Post web service in java. The location path syntax to navigate into an arbitrarily deeply nested structure of JSON objects. This can become a problem if it starts pushing you past the practical URL length limit. A JSON object is an associative array (a.k.a map or hash). So why not use JSON in the URL as well? Well, there's this: But many APIs, including Dropbox's newer APIs, have been moving toward using JSON in the request body. One nice thing about URL encoding is that you can have nice "curl" command-line examples. ![]() OAuth 2 switched to JSON.ĪPI request bodies seem split between JSON and URL encoding. ![]() The last time I dealt with a URL encoded response body was for OAuth 1, which was finalized in 2007. HTTP API responses for structured data are almost always JSON. When you think about it, we've already all sort of decided that JSON is better than URL encoding for some things. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |